The Truth Is Still Out There

Last night, I waited in anticipation for the return of the beloved 90s sci-fi show “The X-files.” The first of six new episodes did not disappoint, and in many ways, it set the show’s central mythology on its head. The show also transitioned well to the present time, which I’ll get to later in this post. Warning: major spoilers ahead.

The show picks up years after series finale, which found Mulder and Scully kicked out of the FBI and on the lamb. Since the final episode of season 9, Scully returned to medicine and Mulder, well,  remained Mulder, convinced that the truth is still out there. A right-wing pundit, conspiracy nut, played by Joel McHale, summons the FBI agents back to action when he introduces them to a young woman who claims she has been abducted multiple times and that her babies have been taken by some unknown force. At first, it seemed like the show went back to the basics: an alien abduction story, just like the pilot episode.

There were several wonderful moments in the episode. Despite the writers’ decision to use the opening credits from the 1990s, the show seamlessly transitioned to 2016. Even more so, the writers showed an awareness of the show’s legacy. Early in the episode, Mulder is watching a YouTube clip of President Obama joking with Jimmy Kimmel about big government conspiracy theories and alien cover-ups. Mulder responds, “My life’s become a punchline.”

The episode also blasts right-wing zealots and conspiracy nuts, even taking a shot at Bill O’Reilly. Joel McHale’s character could be Alex Jones, Glenn Beck or any other right-wing nut who has ranted during the Obama administration about big government taking everyone’s guns and putting us all in white tents.  The irony of this is not lost, considering the Fox empire was essentially built because of the success of two major 90s shows, “The Simpsons” and “The X-files.”

At the heart of the show’s return episode is the idea that the elite in power are the ones we should really fear, not bright lights in the sky. It is also possible that the return episode has flipped the show’s entire mythology. By the end of the episode, Mulder is convinced that the shadowy men/conspirators are ones who need to be feared and fought, that their ultimate aim is full-blown control and subjugation. This idea harkens back to the show’s first two seasons, in which the conspirators were the real villains and the threat of alien existence was never certain. In the later seasons, the aliens took focus and planned a colonization of Earth. The mythos became so ridiculous that there was even a story arc about an alien civil war. Last night’s episode felt a little more grounded in reality.

This possible change/direction for the new season makes sense, considering the show has returned in the age of mass economic inequality and growing global tensions. It’s also possible that the writers realized how bloated the alien mythology had become and they wanted to strip things back to the basics. We have five more episodes to find out!

Here are some basic questions I would also like to see answered.

  1. How/why is the cigarette smoking man still alive, considering his fate in the final episode of season 9?
  2. Whatever happened to William, Scully and possibly Mulder’s son? He was briefly mentioned in the episode, but where has he been?
  3. Does Scully have alien DNA?

 

 

Accessing Obama’s Legacy

Last night, President Obama gave his final State of the Union speech. I want to take some time to reflect on his seven years in office, as he nears the finish line and the country readies itself to elect someone in November to succeed him. Confession: I have always been an Obama supporter. I was a canvasser on his 2008 campaign and a canvass director for his 2012 campaign. I made lifelong friends through both campaigns, and generally, I think that he has governed with an even hand and level-headed temperament. That said, there are certainly mistakes he made during both terms, and at the end of his speech, he acknowledged one of his biggest regrets, which I’ll address later in this post.

First, it is important to consider where the country was when President Obama was sworn in in January 2009. Unemployment was around 10 percent. The country was bogged down in Iraq, and Wall Street crashed the world economy. (Please, go see The Big Short!) Obama’s campaign caught fire because the country was wary of George W. Bush, who left office with an approval rating in the 30s.  The genius of Obama’s first campaign could be found in its main slogan, “Yes, we can.” Simple, right? The country desperately needed optimism at the time, and here was a freshman senator from Illinois who toppled the establishment candidate in the primaries, Hillary Clinton. Here was  a fresh young voice who promised to govern differently and change politics as usual. It was a message that resonated, and Obama had a sweeping victory in 2008, one which increased the Democratic Party’s majorities in the Senate and House.

Obama’s promise to change politics and heal the divide harkened back to his 2004 Democratic Convention keynote address, in which he said that America shouldn’t be divided by red states and blue states. At the time, I was in college and wrote for the student newspaper. After the convention, I penned an editorial stating that Obama was a rising star in the party, presidential material. Four years later, he ran and won.

Yet, perhaps it can be said that President Obama’s promises of change and altering the political landscape to bring the parties together was naïve. In 2012, it was reported that on the day of President Obama’s first inauguration, Republican leaders, including  Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, new House Speaker Paul Ryan, former House Leader Eric Cantor, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and others met to discuss how best to counter Obama. So just as his first term was beginning, the opposing party was deciding how best to stop his agenda.

The Republican’s main defense against the Obama Administration has been utter gridlock, especially after the 2010 and 2014 mid-term elections, when they won control of Congress and a majority of state legislatures.  Congress has not done much and has a dismal approval rating. By doing nothing, the GOP-led Congress has made it seem like government is totally inefficient.  This has impacted the president, pulling down his approval rating, which has not climbed out of the 45 percent range much at all during both terms.

Still, the president managed to get re-elected again in 2012, by quite a large margin. If you look back on his seven years in office, there are a number of accomplishments. Unemployment is now around 5 percent. Gas prices are falling under $2 a gallon. Two progressive justices have been appointed to the Supreme Court. Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell was repealed. More Americans have health insurance. The auto industry is alive. Gay marriage is now legal, and recently, through executive action, new gun laws are on the books, including stronger background checks, which most Americans, including gun owners favor.

Last night, the president’s final SOTU address was meant to counter the pessimism and sour mood plaguing the country. Despite lower unemployment, Americans don’t feel like they’re getting a fair shake. The economic crash and the bailout proved just how rigged the game is. Meanwhile, wages have remained stagnant since the Reagan years. This is why Bernie Sanders has so much support on the left and why Trump is so popular on the right. People are mad, feeling as though the change the president promised in 2008, the message of “Yes, we can” never panned out.

Yet, Obama’s legacy is quite impressive. Still, though, Obama was naïve to think dissolving the divide in Washington would be easy, or even possible. Near the end of his speech last night, he admitted that one regret he has is that the political environment is just as bad or even more toxic than when got to the White House. He offered some solutions, such as campaign finance reform to get big money out of politics and ending gerrymandering. However, it’s not likely any of that will happen soon, especially in an election year.

Right now, the country is mad as hell and doesn’t want to take it anymore. This is an election year in which anything could happen. Trump may very well be the Republican nominee and Sanders could beat Clinton. Latest polling shows him close to her in Iowa and beating her in New Hampshire, the first two primary states. Yet, voters would do well to remember where the country was in 2008. Certainly, we’re better off than where we were. Still, there is work to be done, especially on fairer wages and boiling racial tensions. The president also reminded Americans that in a Jeffersonian, representative democracy, citizen participation is a must. That is what the whole “Yes, we can” slogan was all about. In 2008, too many voters thought that electing one candidate who promised change would quell all of the country’s woes, but it’s more complicated than that. No candidate elected this November will be able to fix everything. That requires real citizen engagement, which is work. Is the country up to the task, or do citizens just want to be angry, vote for the loudest candidate, and then go back to being unengaged the day after the election?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some Reflections on 2015

With the year waning, it’s that time to reflect on where we’ve been and where we’re going. My 2015 was pretty good. At the beginning of the year, I pulled myself out of a long-term relationship and have reconnected with old friends and made some new ones throughout the year. We had some beautiful experiences together. Over the summer, I hiked A LOT, biked, and traveled. I wrote poems. I gave some readings. I got to teach some different literature courses for the first time and thoroughly enjoyed it. I really had some wonderful students this year. At the end of the year, I finished my doctorate and also signed the contract with NYQ Books for my third poetry collection, which will be out fall 2016. Yep, it was a good year, and I’m grateful for my family, friends, colleagues, and my good health.

Here are some of my favorite books/music/films from 2015:

favorite poetry books of 2015:Notes on the Assemblage by Juan Felipe Herrera. I must confess I didn’t really discover his work until more recently, but this book deserves praise for its wide range of forms, everything from prose poems, to sonnets, to collages, which, like his other work, capture the migrant worker experience. With the county still reeling from the recession, and with the continuing economic divided, coupled with the increasing xenophobia, Herrera is the poet laureate this country needs right now.

Application for Release from the Dream by Tony Hoagland: This book is Hoagland’s most biting and attacks hyper consumerism more than his last book. Still, it’s not without its humor. Oh, and there’s a dog poem!

How to Be Drawn by Terrance Hayes: Hayes’ work just feels so relevant right now, and this book is less narrative than his earlier collections and at times, even more experimental than Lighthead, while still addressing issues of race.

Nonfiction: Patti Smith’s M Train. The passages about her writing process and dreams are simply beautiful.

Fiction: Purity by Franzen. I haven’t read a novel this year that better addresses the issues we face today, everything from social media making us more isolated to Homeland Security and NSA surveillance.

Favorite films of 2015:Spotlight and The Big Short. If you see The Big Short, I guarantee you will laugh throughout the movie, but by the end, you will feel immense anger that NO ONE was thrown in jail for the economic crash/Wall Street hijinks that went on in 2007/2008. If you want to better understand the simmering anger this country is experiencing right now and some of the root causes, go see The Big Short. You will remember that countless people lost their homes, savings, and jobs, and we, the taxpayers, bailed out the banksters after their behavior crashed the world economy. And the cast…. what a cast!

Favorite album of 2015: Jeff Rosenstock’s second solo album, We Cool? which just felt really poignant to me this year and where I’m at in my life. It’s an album about “adulthood,” about being in your 30s, whatever that means.

 

No, I did not include The Force Awakens on the list. Yes, it earned uber positive reviews and felt like a Star Wars film, but it was also a very safe film, which walked in the footsteps of the old.

In the new year,  I hope for less comic book movies. Aren’t we sick of those yet? I hope poetry will continue to address the rising race and class tensions, but more people need to read and listen. Poets need to be less insular

Here’s to 2016. Cheers, friends!

A Lit Mag Lives On!

A few months ago, I shared news on this blog that [PANK] was shutting down, after its editors, M. Bartley Seigel and Roxane Gay, announced the news about the cutting-edge mag via social media. The announcement sent ripples through the literary world. New York Times Magazine called PANK “a raft of experimental fiction and poetry.” Travis Kurowski, editor of Story Magazine and columnist for Poets & Writers, said, “Like McSweeney’s was nearly 20 years ago (and The Paris Review 40 years before that), PANK has been one of those lit mags that seemed to represent the zeitgeist of a generation—a literary turn towards diversity, queerness, raw authenticity.”

These quotes come from the introduction to an interview Electric Lit just published with outgoing editor M. Bartley Seigel, and the interview contains some huge news about the fate of the magazine. It’s going to live on! It has been purchased by John Gosslee of Fjords Review.

The interview features a lot of other interesting tidbits. For instance, Seigel states that he and Roxane Gay decided to step away from the magazine because they are in their mid-40s now and have too many projects happening.

Here is what he said about his time editing [PANK] and the state of American literature:

Overall, I ended my tenure at PANK in a very, positive place. American literature is robust, vibrant, and very much kicking and screaming. Reading and editing and publishing PANK only drove home for me that the foundational world of American letters, underpinning the big publishing houses, the major awards, the world of literary magazine and small and independent presses, is wide and deep and teeming with the most amazing publishers, editors, writers, writing, and readers. If I have a critique of American letters, it’s that the average American doesn’t read broadly enough, not enough work in translation, that we’re too isolated, too narrow in our reading habits, still too locked into boxes like the one built out of white male heteronormativity.

I encourage anyone to read the full interview. It provides a lot of insight into the contemporary literary landscape and the future of one of America’s most important lit mags.

Museum of Americana

If you haven’t checked out the online literary journal Museum of Americana, I encourage you to do so. The journal publishes all things Americana, hence the title. The new issue, for instance, features poems that address everything from baseball to the military. My poem, “Lady Day Sings the Blues on YouTube,” is featured in the new issue, so check it out here! Read the rest of the issue, too, as well as the archives. The editors do an excellent job maintaining the theme issue to issue and selecting fiction, essays, and poetry.

Writers on Writing, Routines, Habit

I love reading biographies about writers and interviews with writers. I love peering into their work space and coming to a greater understanding of how they operate. The current issue of The Writer’s Chronicle has an interview with one of my favorite contemporary poets, Kim Addonizzio. The interview, which is only available in print, covers a wide range of topics, and while it does not delve too much into Addonizzio’s specific writing process, it does provide some glimpses into it. For instance, she mentions listening to classical and jazz while composing new work, and maybe this shouldn’t come as surprise, since Addonizzio also plays music and frequently busts out her harmonica to play the blues after she reads a few poems or her fiction.

What’s more interesting about the interview, however, is what Addonizzio has to say about writing in different genres. She admits that some writers are purists and stick to only one genre, but she writes poetry, fiction, and essays. She is quick to note how writing poetry can help with other genres because it teaches a writer to develop precision of language and metaphorical thinking. This is why, when I used to teach creative writing, we always started with poetry, before delving into any other genre of writing. Poetry, as Addonizzio states, helps students focus on the importance of correct word choice and the weight of a single line, and though prose may be longer, those same rules should still apply. It may be typical, too, for us to start out in one genre, but there is no harm in expanding to other genres. She mentions starting out with poetry and then writing fiction when she was in her early 30s. Since then, she has published two novels and two short story collections.

It’s worth picking up the latest issue and reading the interview. It’s another window into a writer’s habits and work routine. For the teachers out there, there is good advice too, namely the importance of writing as both a teacher and a writer and always questioning the techniques a writer used and how that can be covered in the classroom, or turned into a writing prompt.

 

Some Props for Poetry Quarterly

Late last week, the fall 2015 issue of Poetry Quarterly arrived in my mailbox. The journal is about five years old, and I have been published in some of the earlier issues. However, the fall issue is the strongest issue I’ve read to date. It is much slimmer, only about 80 pages, and it has a guest editor, Jodie Hollander. This issue’s featured poet, Christina Pugh, is a recipient of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellowship, and her work has appeared widely, including in The Atlantic Monthly, Poetry, Ploughshares, and elsewhere.

The new issues contains a variety of forms and schools of poetic, from surrealism, to narrative, to the neoformalism of two featured Dave Mason poems. I feel fortunate that my poem, “September,” is published in this issue, and I will continue to support this journal. It’s been a pleasure watching it grow over the last five years. If you’re interested in purchasing any issue, including the new issue, you can do so here.

November Edition of The Writer’s Showcase

If you’re in the Scranton area this weekend and looking for a literary event, then come to the November installment of The Writer’s Showcase, held at the Old Brick Theatre in North Scranton.  To learn more about our featured authors, check out the bios I have posted below. The event runs from 7-9 p.m.

Author bios:

Ali Pica is a local writer for the arts and entertainment site, NEPA Scene. She also has her own advice column in NEPA Scene, “Yeah, Yeah, Yeah Ali.” Ali also has been a featured reader in venues such as the Vintage Theater and AfA Gallery. Ali has performed with several local jazz musicians in the Northeastern PA and New York City. Currently, Ali is working on a short fiction series and is an Adjunct Professor at Keystone College.

Maggie Gilbertson writes and performs poetry. She’s competed at the Brave New Voices competition and many local slams. She is a junior at Dallas High School, and she loves to read and climb trees.

Joan Hanna has published poetry, creative nonfiction, book reviews and essays in various online and print journals. Her forthcoming chapbook, The Miracle of Mercury, is available for order at Finishing Line Press. Hanna’s first chapbook, Threads, also published by Finishing Line Press, was named a finalist in the 2014 Next Generation Indie Book Awards. She teaches creative writing at Rowan University and is also Assistant Managing Editor for River Teeth: A Journal of Nonfiction Narrative and Assistant Editor, Nonfiction/Poetry for r.kv.r.y. Quarterly Literary Journal. Hanna holds an MFA in Creative Writing from Ashland University. Follow her at her personal blog Writing Through Quicksand. (www.writingthroughquicksand.blogspot.com)

Poet and songwriter Tom Blomain is the author of Gray Area (Nightshade Press) and Blues From Paradise (Foothills Publishing).

The Old Brick Theatre is located at 126 W. Market Street. Admission is $4.

What not to do at your featured poetry reading

I want to share this article, which came across on one of my social media feeds. It offers several tips of what to avoid when you give a featured poetry reading. The first point, about knowing your audience, is most important. Whether you are booking a reading tour for a new release, or just doing one reading a year, it is important to do your research. Know the venue. Know the crowd. What type of style/tone do they like? If they are a rowdy crowd, mostly accustomed to performance more than what’s on the page, then keep that in mind, and vice versa. The more you connect with a crowd, the more they will remember your work and perhaps buy a book.

Some of the points are key, too. Never, EVER go over your time. Be mindful that people have lives, and though they may want to hear you read, even your biggest fan does not want to sit through a three-hour set.

Check out the article for some other useful tips!